Since Lutheranism was born and raised in northern Europe, it is not surprising that Minnesota, settled largely by Scandinavian and German immigrants over a century ago, is truly God’s country for many North American Lutherans. Roughly ten percent of all ELCA Lutherans in the US reside in Minnesota, home to six of sixty five regional synods and 1,143 congregations out of 10,400 nationwide.
The Minneapolis Star Tribune (Strib) is the leading Minnesota newspaper, and its Sunday, August 22, edition contained an excellent article reporting on the status of the ELCA one year after the momentous gay friendly resolutions of the 2009 Churchwide Assembly (CWA09)—held in Minneapolis, of course.
This blog has long suggested that the defections from the ELCA are best characterized as a trickle but not a torrent. Strib reporter Jim Spencer concurs. The article is entitled “Lutherans bowed but unbroken”, and that is an apt summary of the article that suggests:
Disappointed opponents predicted a fracture that would cause 1,000 congregations to withdraw. A year later, the ELCA remains largely intact. “That 1,000-congregation figure has proven to be wishful thinking on the part of those who wanted it to happen,” said Larry Wohlrabe, Bishop of Minnesota’s rural Northwestern Synod.
Penny Edgell, a University of Minnesota sociologist who studies American religion, said fears of the ELCA collapsing under the weight of gay clergy decision were “overstated.”
But, as Pastor Jeff from Arizona who frequently comments here will remind us, this past year has not been without pain. Many congregations remaining ELCA are roiled with internal conflict. Financial contributions are way down although most observers would agree that has more to do with the Great Recession than ELCA politics. Declining membership continues, but that has been true for decades, and Professor Edgell notes,
“What’s happening to American Christian churches doesn’t have much to do with these hot-button issues,” Edgell said. “It has to do with demographics. Younger generations don’t view these institutions the same way their parents did.”
Cheerleaders for the demise of the ELCA will not go away quietly. Lutheran CORE, the primary ELCA irritant, will audaciously roll out its new denomination this weekend, the North American Lutheran Church (NALC), trumpeted as “a reconfiguration of North American Lutheranism.” Spencer’s Strib article suggests:
While fewer than 10 congregations have committed to joining NALC, organizers say hundreds eventually will.
Perhaps.
On September 18th, Minnesota will celebrate a Rite of Reconciliation that will formally reinstate Pastor Anita Hill of St Paul and others onto the ELCA roster of ordained clergy. A similar ceremony welcomed seven California LGBTQ pastors onto the ELCA roster earlier this summer. Pastor Hill was mentioned in the Strib article:
“I feel a sense of loss for those who felt they had to leave because I am welcome,” said Anita Hill, a lesbian who is a pastor at St. Paul-Reformation Lutheran Church in St. Paul. Hill defied her church’s ban on gay clergy for eight years as her congregation endured sanctions and battled for change. “I never thought the inclusion of some required others to depart,” she said.
How many church bulletins proclaim “All are welcome”? And mean it? Enjoy this UCC video that is critical of congregations that merely give lip service to full welcome.
Obie, your write,
“Financial contributions are way down although most observers would agree that has more to do with the Great Recession than ELCA politics.”
I do not know the answer to this, but are other mainline denoms cutting budgets the way the ELCA has had to?
@Tony Stoutenburg
I do not deny that some have cut financial contributions to the ELCA due to these decisions. That said, I do not understand why it seems so difficult to accept that people might be cutting their giving simply because the money isn’t there for them to give. I, a strong supporter of the decisions made at CWA09, have cut back my giving this year drastically and that’s simply because I don’t have it. There are people out there who are giving less simply because the economy is bad. There are people out there who are also giving less because of the decisions in Minneapolis a year ago. The entire amount is not due solely to the decisions. I refuse to believe that, no matter how much naysayers and doomsayers profess otherwise.
It’s interesting that I read this post here as I received an email from former Episcopal-turned-Anglican relatives from Pittsburgh today about how the Lutherans are headed down the road of dissent just like the Episcopals. They are quite proud of their diocese for voting to leave the reprobate ECA, and are salivating at watching how the face of American Lutheranism (i.e. the ELCA) will shatter and burn in a hailstorm of heavenly brimstone for voting to turn from the Word of God. At any rate, the article paints a horribly grim picture of the situation of things, but does mention the new starts – quick to mention that they aren’t starting because of the vote, though. The article fails to mention the reconciled churches and pastors though…it fails to mention one opinion of anyone who supported the measures. Simply the opinions of CORE activists and an official from the ELCA, who regrets the decisions of the churches to leave. The article praises the conservatives for standing up for the Word of the Lord and wants to herald the dawning of the “New Reformation” before NALC is even christened…I find it really sick how self-proclaimed Christians can be joyous to see the body of Christ fall apart. How can such hatred be hurled at the supporters of the ministry policies while saying that the “traditionalists” are the true Christians? Wasn’t the second greatest commandment according to our Lord to love your neighbor as yourself? It seems to pronounce judgment on these people when they are acting in good faith seems a bit blasphemous and outright un-Christian to me…
@Tony, I can not answer that for denominations, I can relate what I hear from other denominational pastors….yes, giving since September 2009 has dropped significantly. I have also heard this from other directors of 510c3’s. While the job market here in our area has remained steady, good paying jobs have declined. Homes aren’t selling; cars aren’t selling, sharp decline in big ticket items. The church has always been the last one given to, and the first one cut in difficult times. Are there people not giving because of CW actions, sure, but it is coupled with what I would now call a depression. I do not think the statistics are available to support either claim at this point.
I love that UCC commercial even though it was in poor taste. I think it says a lot about a lot of people in churches. I will now see how the UCC is faring in its “non- discrimination” process. I am not officially a UCC member yet but have been involved enough to find out that CHILDREN are not really welcome at church services because they make NOISE. No wonder there is a choir of 10 people and a regular church attendence of the wives and husbands of the choir members and a few other regulars. I see a need in this church and that is where our support is going to go for as long as the church survives.
I do not doubt that giving is down across the board. My question of comparison has to do with the quoted statement, which is made quite often, everywhere from this prestigious blog all the way down to the ELCA News Service. It just seems to me that without some sort of stats to back it up, to say that “most observers would agree that has more to do with the Great Recession than ELCA politics” is somewhere in the neighborhood of a platitude or an urban legend or the kind of high quality political analysis one gets on a cable news talk show where a panel of people who disagree with each other yell sound bites at the camera. 🙂
BTW, I do not ask out of mean-ness, or a desire to see the ELCA collapse, or glee. (I actually used to know some of the folks whose jobs are in jeopardy.) I’m just curious.
@Tony Stoutenburg
I’m sorry if I implied you were asking because you were happy about it. My last sentence in that paragraph could be construed ambiguously. I did not mean you directly, but rather those who are selling stock in the ELCA right now and giddy about it to boot.
Has anyone, interestingly enough, read the tidbit in the most recent Lutheran how the Roman Catholic Church is running a deficit budget despite increased giving this year from the faithful around the world? In case you didn’t, I’ll spoil the surprise for you. The cause for the shortfall: building projects. Such expenditures are also the reason that tourists aren’t allowed to photograph or videotape the Sistine Chapel until a specific date (I forget it, though) as the Vatican sold the rights to a single company in order to fund construction.
@Tony Stoutenburg
Tony, I think the evidence is mostly anecdotal to this point as figures for 2009 and 2010 are still coming in. However, here is some hard data. First, a quote from an ELCA budget document states that churchwide revenues are expected to be down 5%.
Next, I offer data from the US Center on Wealth and philanthropy that suggests all US charitable giving was down 5% in 2009 on top of a 6% decline in 2008.
Based on these two items, it would appear the ELCA is in much the same situation as other charitibable institutions, and the impact of any financial boycott is de minimis. Of course, 2010 could well show greater impact.
Anyone still following this? I wonder whether, if you take the long term seriously, this analysis is more scary for the ELCA than that of conservatives blaming liberals (or liberals blaming conservatives) for the decline. It means the cause of the membership and attendance tailspin is more fundamental than any one hot button issue, and possibly more fundamental even than the general liberal-conservative culture war. Is Lutheranism in North America simply becoming irrelevant – tied more to outdated immigrant cultures than to the mission of the Gospel?
@Robert
You raise an issue far broader than this old post and far broader than Lutheranism. Surveys show that the percentage of “nones”, those who claim no religious affiliation, are skyrocketing, especially for the under 30 crowd. Check out another old post of mine that discusses this phenomenon: http://www.theliberalspirit.com/?p=2957
Obie, here in Clintonville, we are happy that now, with some needed remodeling and some comfortable chairs, we are growing. Our first confirmation will be this month. A number of our newer members were dropouts from the LCMC church. Some had had bad experiences years ago and are now joining us. We are getting some very talented people. Faith still needs prayer and money so keep us in mind.
@Lilly
Delighted to hear this good news. One day, I’ll have to drop in, though you’re a bit off the beaten path.