What motivates us as human beings? Why do we do what we do?
I am of the flesh, sold into slavery under sin. I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate. I see in my members another law at war with the law of my mind, making me captive to the law of sin that dwells in my members.
Wretched man that I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death?
These words of Paul the apostle from the 7th chapter of his letter to the Romans serve as the epigraph to my novel and the source of the title, A Wretched Man, a novel of Paul the apostle. As these verses from Paul suggest, we have long wrestled with the problem of the human will. The wonderings of philosophers such as Schopenhauer & Nietzsche; psychoanalysts such as Freud & Jung; and literary figures such as Somerset Maugham & Thomas Mann suggest it’s complicated and self-awareness is difficult.
What about homophobia? What is the source of this phenomenon? Let’s start with a definition–this one is Merriam-Webster’s online version:
irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals
and Wikipedia’s description:
Homophobia is a range of negative attitudes and feelings towards homosexuality and people identified or perceived as being homosexual. Definitions refer variably to antipathy, contempt, prejudice, aversion, and irrational fear. Homophobia is observable in critical and hostile behavior such as discrimination and violence on the basis of a perceived non-heterosexual orientation. In a 1998 address, author, activist, and civil rights leader Coretta Scott King stated that “Homophobia is like racism and anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry in that it seeks to dehumanize a large group of people, to deny their humanity, their dignity and personhood.”
Let’s take it a step further; what is “internalized homophobia”? Here’s the opening paragraph from a UC-Davis Psychology Department study:
Among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals, internalized sexual stigma (also called internalized homophobia) refers to the personal acceptance and endorsement of sexual stigma as part of the individual’s value system and self-concept. It is the counterpart to sexual prejudice among heterosexuals.
In other words, it is gay folks accepting negative societal, cultural, or religious stigma and applying such negative values toward oneself. Self-condemnation. Self-doubt and low self esteem en extremis. It doesn’t take deep psychological insight to recognize that internalized homophobia is not healthy. High incidence of suicide. Drug and alcohol abuse. Inability to have meaningful relationships.
And sometimes, the internalized homophobia results in outrageous behavior toward other gays. An extreme example is Andrew Cunanan, the murderer of Gianni Versace; political examples include US Senator Larry Craig & California State Senator Ray Ashburn; and religious examples include Ted Haggard, “rentboy” William Rekers, and now Minnesota pastor and outspoken opponent of the ELCA gay friendly policies, Pastor Tom Brock of Hope Lutheran Church of Minneapolis (Hope Church is not ELCA but AFLC—Association of Free Lutheran Churches–a small and conservative Lutheran denomination).
The “outing” of Pastor Brock was a journalistic abomination for which there is no excuse, and the offending magazine has received appropriate condemnation. Yet, the exposure of Pastor Brock raises the question of other outspoken anti-gay religious leaders. Let me be perfectly clear, I make no suggestion that this is the sole or even the primary motivation for those religious leaders in various denominations that oppose gay inclusive policies. Yet, one wonders whether Pastor Brock is merely an isolated and atypical example or merely the tip of the iceberg. What is it about human sexuality that makes some squirm? How often does sexual angst undergird homophobia?
Whatever the motivation, religious leaders who bash gay folks over the head with their Bibles need to seriously question themselves—are they really offering a solution to gay suicide, gay drug and alcohol abuse, and gay casual relationships or are they part of the problem? Are they advancing the kingdom of God or stalling it? Are they truly seeking God’s will or merely proof texting the Bible to justify their own biases, prejudices and even their own homophobia?
Don’t, please don’t, respond with the horrific notion that you hate the sin but love the sinner, at worst a self-justifying excuse for murky motivations behind hurtful behavior and at best a misunderstanding of the reality of self-loathing that may be triggured by such seemingly benign comments.
This is a good article. Yesterday, some ladies in our weight loss club were discussing the latest vote by a neighboring church so I joined the discussion. I had previously shared that I had a good time talking to my ex son in law and her partner on Saturday. I had noticed some dropped faces when I talked about it. Anyway, it turns out that several of the people who were originally interested in starting a new ELCA church have changed their minds because of the gay issue. It has taken me a few years to really accept my ex son in law as she is but when I see that my daughter is ok with it now, that helps. Because my son in law’s transition was triggered by job loss and severe depression, we have always been afraid she would try suicide. If that happened I am afraid it would very badly affect the kids.
I blundered into a cable TV broadcast some time back of Tom Brock and was sickened by what I saw and heard as he appeared to me to use the Bible as a blunt weapon to beat people over the head. Although I was not surprised by the “outing” of him by a magazine, I’m deeply disappointed that a dirty trick betrayal of his confidence was perpetrated by that magazine. The guy “may” be a homophobe jerk, or not, but he didn’t deserve that stab in the back. No one does. Besides, the veracity of the magazine is now deeply suspect in everything they print. If they stooped so low as to falsely gain entry into the confidence of the support group, and then betrayed what they heard there, what else have they done to obtain stories? The end, in this case the outing of a gay basher, is not justified by the means. I don’t like gay bashers, but I despise traitors. There are other ways, ethical ways, to get the information out. Shame on the magazine for not using them.
What the author (I have trouble calling him a reporter) did turns my stomach. I run into men and women in high profile positions that will not seek help from support groups because of what happened to Pastor Brock. However, this is where my sympathy ends. I have always said “beware of those who protest too much.” Brock is not the first, nor will he be the last. One positive impact of this event, it shows that by simply leaving the ELCA you are not guaranteed that you will never have a gay pastor in your pulpit. Wouldn’t you rather know the person is gay than have him/her hide who they truly are?
Hey Obie. Thanks for the thoughtful comment. Good to hear from someone in the ECLA- try as I may to immerse myself in all flavors of religious media, it seems that the only voices coming out of denominational leadership these days are very, very conservative voices.
Perhaps you have some thought on why homosexuality, more than anything else, seems to be such a focus of Christian leadership these days?
@Chris
Part of the explanation is the gist of this post. But, I think the greatest reason is control. Just as politicians use culture wars to rouse their base, certain church leaders frighten the folks in the pews in order to boost their own power. In my own ELCA, it is clear that many have been railing against the ELCA since its inception and they see the passage of pro-gay resolutions last year as their opportunity–first to take over the ELCA but failing in that to form their own denomination where they can be in control.
Chris, I would agree that there is over-focus on the issue, but I would suggest that it is because it is the one being laid at our door by activists and / or the culture. The focus is reactive. This is a critique being set forth by ’emergant church’ types (another pointless, vague label. 🙂 ) They do not agree with the culture, by and large, but they think the emPHAsis in on the wrong syLABle, as my mother used to say.